QM-009HighProviderPreventive
Accountability Framework and Governance
Providers must establish a clear accountability framework identifying senior management responsibility for AI compliance, with defined governance structures that ensure escalation of compliance issues to appropriate decision-making levels.
Articles:Article 17(1)Article 17(2)
Evidence Examples
- AI governance charter
- Accountability matrix
- Board-level compliance reporting template
Standards
ISO 42001:2023 §5.1ISO 42001:2023 §5.3
Related controls
- QM-001Quality Management System EstablishmentArticle 17(1) requires providers of high-risk AI systems to put in place a quality management system that ensures compliance with the requirements of the…
- QM-002Regulatory Compliance StrategyProviders must establish and document a strategy for achieving and maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, including the EU AI…
- QM-003Design Control ProceduresProviders must implement documented design control procedures that ensure regulatory and performance requirements are systematically incorporated from the…
- QM-004Data Management ProceduresProviders must have documented data management procedures covering the acquisition, preparation, use, and retention of data throughout the AI system…
- QM-005Staff Training and Competency ProceduresArticle 17(1)(d) requires providers to implement procedures for training personnel involved in AI system development, testing, and monitoring, with…
- QM-006Pre-Market Testing and Validation ProceduresProviders must implement documented procedures for pre-market testing and validation of high-risk AI systems, including the metrics to be achieved, the…
Related EU AI Act terms
Upgrade when it needs to be
The free questionnaire returns preliminary signals. The Full Assessment turns real system material into a governed decision record - extraction, component separation, evidence, national overlays, and a review-ready dossier.
Start free risk preview