TD-010MediumProviderDetective
Technical Documentation Review and Approval
Providers must establish a formal review and approval process for technical documentation to ensure accuracy, completeness, and continued applicability, with records of each review cycle maintained for at least 10 years.
Articles:Article 11(3)Article 18
Evidence Examples
- Document review approval signatures
- Periodic documentation audit report
- 10-year retention schedule
Standards
ISO 42001:2023 §7.5Annex IV EU AI Act
Related controls
- TD-001AI System Description and General InformationArticle 11 and Annex IV require that technical documentation includes a general description of the AI system covering its intended purpose, the persons…
- TD-002Design Specifications and ArchitectureProviders must document the overall design logic of the AI system, including the algorithms and associated design choices, the key design parameters, and…
- TD-003Development Process DocumentationTechnical documentation must describe the methods and steps performed for the development of the AI system, including data collection, labelling, model…
- TD-004Validation and Testing Approach DocumentationProviders must document the validation and testing procedures applied to the AI system prior to placing it on the market, including the metrics used, the…
- TD-005System Monitoring Plan DocumentationTechnical documentation must include a plan describing the measures for monitoring the AI system in operation, the data to be collected, the performance…
- TD-006Accuracy Metrics and Performance DocumentationProviders must document the accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity metrics for which the high-risk AI system was designed and the relevant testing…
Related EU AI Act terms
Upgrade when it needs to be
The free questionnaire returns preliminary signals. The Full Assessment turns real system material into a governed decision record - extraction, component separation, evidence, national overlays, and a review-ready dossier.
Start free risk preview