AR-007MedioProveedorPreventivo
Validación de entradas y controles de calidad de datos
Los proveedores deben implementar mecanismos de validación de entrada que verifiquen la calidad, el formato y la plausibilidad de los datos antes de que sean procesados por el sistema de IA, rechazando o señalando las entradas que queden fuera de los parámetros aceptables.
Artículos:Article 15(3)Article 10(3)
Ejemplos de evidencia
- Input validation specification
- Validation rule documentation
- Rejected input handling procedure
Normas
ISO 42001:2023 §8.4ISO/IEC 5259
Controles relacionados
- AR-001Accuracy Level Definition and CommitmentArticle 15(1) requires that high-risk AI systems are designed and developed to achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity,…
- AR-002Accuracy Measurement and VerificationProviders must measure and verify the accuracy of the AI system against defined metrics using representative test sets, documenting the methodology,…
- AR-003Robustness Testing Against Input VariationsProviders must test the AI system's robustness against input variations that may arise in real-world deployment, including incomplete data, noisy inputs,…
- AR-004Adversarial Robustness TestingWhere relevant to the AI system's use case, providers must test robustness against adversarial inputs designed to cause misclassification, data poisoning…
- AR-005Cybersecurity Measures for AI SystemsArticle 15(5) requires that high-risk AI systems are resilient against unauthorised third-party attempts to alter their outputs, and providers must…
- AR-006Fallback Procedures for System FailuresProviders must design and implement fallback procedures that activate when the AI system cannot operate within its designed parameters, ensuring safe…
Términos relacionados de la Ley de IA
- Data GovernancePractices and policies applicable to training, validation, and testing data sets used for high-risk AI systems, covering the design choices, data collection, and preparation processes, and ensuring datasets are relevant, sufficiently representative, and free of errors and complete.
- AccuracyThe requirement that high-risk AI systems achieve an appropriate level of accuracy in relation to their intended purpose, as specified in the technical documentation. Providers must declare the level of accuracy in the instructions for use.
- RobustnessThe ability of a high-risk AI system to maintain its level of performance under adverse conditions — including technical limitations, adversarial inputs, errors, or unexpected situations — or within foreseeable operating conditions outside the intended purpose.
- CybersecurityThe requirement that high-risk AI systems are resilient against attempts by third parties to alter their use, behaviour, or performance in ways that could result in risks to health, safety, or fundamental rights, including protection against data poisoning, adversarial examples, and model evasion attacks.
Actualice cuando la conformidad deba ser
El cuestionario gratuito ofrece señales preliminares. La Evaluación Completa convierte la documentación real del sistema en un expediente de decisión auditable: extracción, separación de componentes, evidencias, normativas nacionales y dossier listo para auditoría.
Iniciar vista previa gratuita de riesgos